Page 1 of 3

What Passives to take!!!

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:11 pm
by Bullz
M really confused what passives to take...
I agree robust is a must lvl 5/6
but apart from that?
M interested in HKs that too mace

out of 60 point u get in all till 160, how should we distribute...
m confused coz mostly ppl prefer robust n blunt lvl 6, but in that case when in pvp majority of times in pvp a hk is supposed to use bragir as mostly it is not 1v1. Even if it is against mages n archers its difficult to use mace. Especially against archers 2 crits from grashat n HK down. So bragir is must. Then taking blunt masty is really so important?

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:43 am
by Duhyou
Fatality baby if you're sword...

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:20 am
by Misteroldie
HK Passives..In Order of Importance..!!

Robust (5 is better coz 6 consumes a lot of ps points and costs 150 million more).
Mastery (Depends whether you are Sword or Mace).
Armoury(Must coz it gets doubled with BoR).
Fatality(You need criticals,dont you?).
Evasion(I simply love it).

I dont think you will have any more passives left..!! :P :P

Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 6:21 am
by Suckkminee
hmm.. I consider Fatality and Fortune(Crit Evasion) almost useless if U wanna be good at PVP.. In high level PVP matches more often than not U find ppl using Dex Uniques.. So crits is taken out of consideration... So is the crit eva...

Having said that since U have a Mace build U have a decent Crit hit rate i.e 27%+34%(with lvl 100 SS)=61%.. Which is good enough for those without Dex Uniques...

My personal choice of passives:

lvl 5 Robust - 20 PS req. (HK's have relatively less HP)
lvl 4 Blunt Mastery - 12 PS req. (For Bossing)
lvl 4 Sword Mastery - 12 PS req. (For PKing and PVP)

The above is the Basic requirement... The reason why i'm keeping the Masteries at lvl 4 is lvl 5 induces PENALTY and also requires 7 PS point... For another 24 dmg wasting 7 PS points and reducing ur accuracy and Magic Eva. is not wise I guess...

After this(when U get to lvl 150+) then U can think abt going for Armoury or lvl 6 Robust as well.. I personally never wanted to go for Armoury coz in PVP especially ur BoR will not be ON for a very long time and for bossing I prefer more HP than armour... Coz as it is Mace HK's can tank 6-7 bosses with their BoR(at 140+)... It is just that U need more HP for the longetivity... 8)

well

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:16 am
by Demoniccurse
err
thanks
but i ment what passives at lvl 160.
ie how to distrible it.

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:44 pm
by Hakuronsama
umm u guys forgot about EB..........cheter do u need EB....i no its only 2 psp's but still makes sum diff i guess....

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:46 pm
by Hakuronsama
oh and well if u take a hi lvl robust den wont ur MP come down drastically..like by a 100 or sumthin na..........so wont dat affect ur PvP as well as PvE.....cause HKs have hi MP consuming skills.....(BoR and Raz)....
does it make a diff or wat?

Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:51 pm
by Hakuronsama
and sorry for da triple post but im tryin to take a leaf outta cola_drinkers book :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: .........damn at this rate hell catch up wid arthas in no time and may even pas rex :shock: :shock:

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:39 am
by Duhyou
At the moment we both are going at the same pace...not one more or one less...so basically that difference between us will stay..i'll move ahead..and so will he.. :D

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 2:03 pm
by Hakuronsama
wt bout ma q about robust :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: :?: