Page 1 of 2
Freeze vs Sorbert
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 pm
by Arijeet
ok guys i wud like to know one thing. how come freeze is considered a better move den sorbert. i mean both of dem stun. but sorbert does higher damage compared to freeze.so how come all hatrel parites require freezers an not ppl wid sorbert.(if im not mistaken sorbert has area effect). im really puzzeld by dis.
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:03 am
by Hyperknight
lol sobert doesnt have area affect dude
If hks get freeze also then what is the use of warriors.
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:05 am
by Xeaon
freeze dont stun , sorbert dont have area effect.
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:01 am
by destroyerz2
lol por kid IC dont rape him...
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 12:16 pm
by Arijeet
wtf......... i asked three freakin hks all told me sorbert has area... fkin liers........lol.... but in the game guide it says dat monsters within a certain area will be paralyzed.......
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 12:17 pm
by Arijeet
i mean for freeze
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 5:24 pm
by destroyerz2
yea its called FREEZE not STUN thts wat indian chicken meant
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 5:55 pm
by Xeaon
Freeze = They get paralysed and dont attack you. Its what it means -freeze" mobs where they are, they cant move, so u get time to hit them.
Stun = The mobs are pushed back few steps, usually 2 steps in most of stun skills, so u get space to hit mobs.
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 4:53 pm
by Mightyarthur
poor chap did not reply also ic not good
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:11 pm
by Haidera
Sorbets only useful on 3 kinda creeps.
Cynics, Lalons and TTs.
Besides these 3 creeps its a damn waste of a skill.